The rationale for the inventory is not only informative. It also shows that a whole readmission system exists linking today more than 125 countries of destination, transit, and origin, whether these are poor or rich, large or small, conflict-ridden or not, democratically organized or authoritarian. This is a powerfully inclusive system.
To understand the scope of this system, it is important to analyze the drivers that have been conducive to its unprecedented geographical expansion and materialization. The analysis of such drivers lies at the intersection of various disciplines including political science, international relations, law, cognitive psychology, linguistics, and history. The field of investigation on the readmission system is huge and interdisciplinary research is much needed.
The readmission system is not only built on obligations which would be defined in customary international law. Nor is it only a system based on incentives, costs and benefits. It is also a system contingent on predominant schemes of understanding, paradigms and a hegemonic lexicon shaping policy perceptions and priorities. The bilateral cooperation on readmission (be it based on standard or non-standard agreements) would never have acquired such a spectacular magnitude, beyond national vested interests, without the emergence of exceptional epistemic conditions.
The inventory constitutes a schematic illustration of the consequences of such conditions that need to be further explored. These may have clear implications for the rights and safety of foreign nationals above all when the latter are removed to conflict-ridden countries or to countries where irregular migration is sanctioned by law. Similarly, they may have indirect implications for the ways in which state-citizen relationships have been reconfigured over the last two decades. This is what makes the current practice of readmission unprecedented.